bad
-
then i shall build you back again | les miserables | enjolras/grantaire | m for sex | 2,878
Enjolras fulfills his promise to let Grantaire help him out of his women’s clothing, Enjolras asks unexpected questions, Grantaire acts as a teacher.
sequel to artemis, aphrodite. god bless tumblr user yosb once again.
“We shall see” is the statement that ran through Grantaire’s head for the rest of the night in a voice so terribly charming. It caused a stir among his dulled thoughts while Enjolras picked roses from Prouvaire’s garden (this was Grantaire’s mockery of an idea, but it seemed to spark a real interest in Enjolras), a carousel sewn with delicate lace designs held daintily above his head (it was dark, this was for Enjolras’ own personal amusement.)
-
“Oh, come ON!! I know Cake is a pussy, but, GODDAMN IT Gumball!!! Your girl version is manlier than you >:C .”
oh jesus shut the fuck up
WHAT THE FRICK
-
(via nicesawa)
-
-
female kings are so much cooler than queens give me more female kings
-
“He was the king that should have been. He was the best of them.”
(via nicesawa)
-
Okay you stupid revisionists and apologists, always remember this. He wasn’t coerced or manipulated. Griffith said “yes.” Griffith said “I sacrifice.”
yeah, it’s not liked he was tortured for a year while being kept in a basement with basically no light, unable to move or talk, then saved by the person who abandoned him just to find out they were going to abandon him again, as well as someone who had always admired him looking at him with an expression full of pity before he fell into a river, broke several limbs, failed his suicide attempt and then was guilt-tripped by some ugly weird giant people who knew one of his weakest spots before he said that
You’re right, it’s not like that at all.
It was TWO of his weakest spots: guilt over the wasted lives of the Hawks and Guts’ opinion (“Ain’t this part of the path to your dream? You believe that, don’t you? What’s with (the doubt)? Now, of all times.”)
As for the OP, “He wasn’t manipulated. He said yes.” That’s not even an argument. He said yes. Okay. Well, we knew that. What’s that got to do with whether or not he was manipulated?
Putting those sentences next to one another doesn’t actually make them a coherent point. His saying yes doesn’t somehow imply that he wasn’t manipulated any more than his saying no would imply he was manipulated. In fact, if he WAS manipulated, it would be pretty ineffective manipulation if it resulted in his saying no.
-
-
(via lyannas)
-
“Oh godDAMNIT, MARIUS”
“What? It looks nicer that way!”
“It’s not supposed to look NICE, idiot, it’s supposed to send a MESSAGE”
“it IS sending a message, Enjolras! A message that I am in LOVE!”
“i hate you so fucking much.”
(via lalondes)
